Food security: Ag's big challenge

25 Apr, 2014 04:00 AM
Comments
13
 
Sustainable intensification is the biggest challenge the world has ever seen

CAN the world’s plant breeders and crop producers continue to increase food production at a pace to match a global population growth rate that is predicted to increase from the current 7.2 billion people to 9.6 billion by 2050?

That was one of the weighty questions the world’s top wheat breeders grappled with at the Borlaug international wheat summit in Mexico in March.

Imperial College London professor of international development Sir Gordon Conway told the conference that while food production currently matched population growth, the emerging middle class and changing dietary demands of developing countries were presenting new challenges to the food production sector.

“If you are just talking about feeding more people as they are being fed now we can do it. But the big challenge is that in many of the emerging countries like China, India, Brazil, Mexico and Korea their diets are changing,” he said.

“They are consuming more livestock products and that needs grain, so we will need more grain to feed them. China, for example, is producing a large amount of livestock now and is importing two-thirds of the world’s soybean market.”

Professor Conway said any advances in food production would have to be achieved in a world where good quality land and water supplies were at their limit.

“So we are going to have to produce more with less. That is the mantra for the future,” he said.

“Scientists know how to do that. But we have to intensify sustainably which means we have to use less damaging inputs like pesticides and fertiliser, reduce the amount of greenhouse gasses from agriculture, improve soil water holding capacity and make it more resilient to climate change.

“It is not just intensification we need, which will be tough enough to achieve, but we have to do it in a way that is sustainable. Sustainable intensification is the biggest challenge the world has ever seen.”

Feeding the world in the future is an issue CSIRO honorary research fellow and former director of wheat research at the CIMMYT centre in Mexico, Tony Fischer, has canvassed in a new book co-authored with Derek Byerlee and Greg Edmeades titled Crop yields and global food security: will yield increases continue to feed the world?.

Dr Fischer told the Mexico conference that while plant breeders were still increasing on-farm yields in most crops by about 1 per cent per annum, it was going to become increasingly difficult to keep up that rate of production increase.

He said it was no longer possible to achieve the substantial increases of the past that have seen wheat yields in Mexico’s Yaqui Valley increase seven-fold in the 65 years since the late 1940s when yields were below 1 tonne/hectare.

When Dr Fischer arrived in Mexico to work at CIMMYT in 1970, production under irrigation had reached about 4t/ha.

“I remember how excited we were in 1975 when it reached 5t/ha. And just last year the valley hit just over 7t/ha,” he said.

“So there is ongoing progress but the relative rate of progress is slowing down.

“It was very spectacular in the first years. Now it is down to 1pc.

“Yet the figures suggest we need to be above 1pc if we are going to feed the world.”

Dr Fischer said of the three staples – wheat, maize and rice – wheat would be the most difficult to achieve significant advances in production.

With fewer opportunities for agronomic and on-farm advances to lift wheat production, the focus would be on breeders to achieve the gains through variety performance improvements, but it would be a very difficult task.

“The demand for wheat is stronger than the demand for rice and the yield gaps for wheat between what farmers are getting and what we get on the experimental stations are smaller," he said.

"So in the case of wheat there is less scope for gap closing which means there is more need to make the progress through breeding.

“Maize yields are growing at 1.5pc per annum dominated by a very strong private sector, hybrids and genetic engineering.

"There are big yield gaps between what farmers are getting, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa and India. So I think maize will stay ahead of demand better than rice, and both of them better than wheat.”

Dr Fischer said there was an urgent need to boost investment in research, development and extension to meet the increasing demands on global food production.

“And in those parts of the world where there is a huge yield gap between what we get on an experimental station and what farmers get, there is a need for a huge investment in all the things we take for granted in developed countries like Australia – that is roads, markets, rural education, institutions, land tenure. All those things act as a drag on farmers modernising,” he said.

Closer to home, Dr Fischer called for increased investment in agricultural research and development in Australia where he attributed a declining rate of crop advancement to cutbacks in research funding.

“There has been a slow down in productivity growth in the Australian wheat industry in the last decade, even if you account for the severe droughts in the first decade of this millennium,” he said.

“There has been a marked reduction in the percentage of our agricultural gross domestic product (GDP) we invest in research.

“It is down from 5pc in the public sector 30 years ago to about 3pc now, but there has been some pickup in the private sector.”

Neil Lyon travelled to Mexico with the assistance of the Crawford Fund and the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade’s Council on Australia Latin America Relations.

Page:
1
FarmOnline
Neil Lyon

Neil Lyon

is the national machinery writer for Fairfax Agricultural Media
Date: Newest first | Oldest first

READER COMMENTS

VivKay
25/04/2014 9:17:24 AM

Just how are natural biological and ecological system meant to upgrade their systems to produce more food - on less? There is climate change to consider too. Why isn't the UN mustering up a world challenge to make sure there's universal access to family planning? Surely the more obvious way to meet food security challenges would be to address global overpopulation. This "food security" threat is a euphemism for the Malthusian crisis!
Bunker DOwn
25/04/2014 9:52:21 AM

This is hardly the problem of a farmer, it is our biggest opportunity. You won't find me investing in how to produce wheat sustainably when the problem is the unsustainability of the global population. Time to store up some fat before the inevitable population crash comes (viral no doubt to be the cause). The samrt ones will actually be seling their farms to the 'sophisticates'
Recalcitrant
25/04/2014 9:52:42 AM

Demand outstrips supply is okay with me - prices will go up and I make more money.
ggwagga
25/04/2014 10:06:40 AM

Well said VivKay. The world is no different to a farm - if you are over stocked your in trouble, especially in a drought. There are limits to the carrying capacity of any given plot of land and the earth population has reached its limit without further degrading soil, water and air.
nico
25/04/2014 10:15:06 AM

You are correct, VivKay. In Australia, Dr Fischer "attributed a declining rate of crop advancement to cutbacks in research funding." The decline in research funding is government policy, from both sides. Science funding, like education funding, is seen by government as an easy target. A more civilised approach would see these funding areas as an investment rather than a cost. Australia is becoming dangerously ill-equipped to deal with the threats of climate change, over-population, and militant ignorance.
Mranda
25/04/2014 5:50:16 PM

There are lots of ways yet to be fully explored that May enable us to produce more food from the land area available - GM technology for example. Not to mention that much of the land in the world is not being farmed to its potential because old methods are still being used, or because protectionist policies mean that that land is not necessarily being used for what it's best at growing. The challenge for agriculture across the world is finding a way to best work together to produce enough food sustainably as the population grows. A challenge I believe we are up to.
Archibald
25/04/2014 6:05:43 PM

When I look at how much arable land in Australia is grazing horses, unused and just unproductive because there is no money in food production, the effect will be when food production receives a viable and profitable income then production will increase. Until then food production will decline. just look how many farmers in Europe are paid to produce little. its unsustainable
ecoengine
26/04/2014 9:25:16 AM

The sacred human right of reproduction can't be touched, but Nature will do it for us eventually! Nothing can keep growing infinitely in the natural world, but humans don't seem to understand - despite presuming to be the most intelligent species on the planet. Dr Norman Borlaug, the "father of the Green Revolution", already warned us about the "population monster" in his 1970 Nobel Peace Prize speech - but it's been ignored.
Samg
28/04/2014 7:48:35 PM

There is no food shortage just poor distribution of protein.
Samg
28/04/2014 7:48:38 PM

There is no food shortage just poor distribution of protein.
1 | 2  |  next >

POST A COMMENT


Screen name *
Email address *
Remember me?
Comment *
 

COMMENTS

light grey arrow
Sorry did i get it wrong..? Rankins Springs is still open..?!
light grey arrow
No doubt a few frosted Freddies out there who will wish they had taken a closer look at the AGC
light grey arrow
Matthew, I was wondering if you had followed up this story with the farmer after the whole