Ag spat could harm farmers: NFF

24 Mar, 2015 03:00 AM
Dr Paul Grimes, Shadow Agriculture Minister Joel Fitzgibbon and Agriculture Minister Barnaby Joyce.
We want to make sure that the right person goes into that role now
Dr Paul Grimes, Shadow Agriculture Minister Joel Fitzgibbon and Agriculture Minister Barnaby Joyce.

AUSTRALIAN farmers need an Agriculture Department head working “hand in glove” with the minister to prevent lost opportunity for the sector, according to National Farmers' Federation (NFF) president Brent Finlay.

The government is currently seeking to appoint a permanent replacement for sacked Agriculture Department Secretary Dr Paul Grimes, whose appointment was terminated after his relationship with Agriculture Minister Barnaby Joyce became untenable.

The former Environment Department head was foisted onto Mr Joyce after the 2013 federal election, when Prime Minister Tony Abbott sacked the Agriculture Secretary Andrew Metcalfe, a move understood to have been due to petty politics related to immigration policy.

But tensions between Mr Joyce and Dr Grimes have been simmering below the surface since then, due to differences in personality and professional philosophies. Various sources describe the pairing of Dr Grimes and Mr Joyce as one of 'polar opposites'.

Phillip Glyde has been acting Secretary since Dr Grimes took leave around an unusual Senate hearing on March 5, when issues with Mr Joyce’s Hansard changes from October last year, and a subsequent Freedom of Information (FOI) request, were addressed.

Labor’s Shadow Agriculture Minister Joel Fitzgibbon has been attacking Mr Joyce over allegations he misled parliament in relation to the Hansard changes, over a question on drought support for farmers.

Challenging staff cuts: Finlay

Mr Finlay told Fairfax Media he was concerned the loss of Dr Grimes could have an impact on Australian agriculture at a rare time of great opportunity, especially for boosting trade into food-hungry export markets.

“We need a minister and a department working hand in glove together to support Australian farmers and do what needs to be done by the Agriculture Department,” he said.

“We’re looking obviously to know what’s going to happen next, as we transition to a new Secretary.

“But again, if we go back and look at the election commitments to agriculture, from the Coalition government, it was all about having a department that would work closely with the minister and work closely with Australian agriculture, for Australian agriculture.

“There have been a number of staff cuts in the Agriculture Department as there have been in all departments, and that has been a challenging time.

“But we need a minister who’s passionate about Australian agriculture and we also need a secretary who’s passionate about Australian agriculture, and making sure that the department is working for Australian agriculture.”

Mr Finlay said he’d not heard any names yet for any potential replacements, outside of Mr Glyde.

He said he and NFF senior staff would seek to hold talks with Mr Glyde next week, given Dr Grimes and NFF CEO Simon Talbot held monthly meetings.

“We certainly need to continue that arrangement and contact during whatever transition time period we’re going through,” he said.

“We have to work together, and that is the theme of what the NFF are very much about; trying to pull agriculture together and all components of agriculture, whether that’s the minister, the secretary, the department, agricultural representation, all the way through to farmers and businesses.

“We have to work closely together to actually take this great opportunity that’s in front of us right now.”

Fallout in parliament

Dr Grimes' sacking sparked heated debate during question time in Canberra last week as Labor leader Bill Shorten pursued Mr Abbott over his knowledge of the sacking, and Mr Fitzgibbon also continued to push Mr Joyce about his handling of the Hansard corrections.

But Mr Joyce hit back saying he’d uncovered “further documents to assist the Member for Hunter” in his search for answers, including a media article relating to his resignation as Defence Minister in 2009, for breaching the ministerial code of conduct.

Mr Shorten also asked the Prime Minister to advise the House what reasons he gave to the Governor-General for Dr Grimes’ dismissal, as required under the Public Service Act.

But Mr Abbott read the statement released by Mr Joyce’s office last week following the abrupt sacking.

“There's no question of wrongdoing by anyone here; simply the absence of the relationship necessary between a minister and a departmental secretary,” Mr Abbott said.

Mr Finlay said appointing the right replacement for Dr Grimes was now the key, while stressing there was no need to rush any decision.

He was reluctant to pass judgment on the decision to remove Mr Metcalfe, saying it was one made by the Abbott government.

“We’ve obviously followed this issue very closely but we want to make sure that the right person goes into that role now,” he said.

“It’s something that’s happened in Canberra and as we know a lot goes on in Canberra and people sort of shake their heads and say, ‘well this is another saga, what’s the theme of today?’

“(But) it’s about working for Australian agriculture and I know I keep belting on about this but we have this wonderful opportunity and we’ve got to get on with it and all these other things are all sideshows.

“What we’d obviously like to see is a lot of positive stories about progressing Australian agriculture.

“We understand politicians are politicians and they’re all trying to score marks,” he said.

“But what we’d like peoples’ focus to be is working on converting these opportunities for Australian agriculture, back inside (the) farmgate.”

'Politicians are politicians'

He said farmers just wanted politicians to get on and do what’s best for the country and best for agriculture.

“Politicians are politicians so they’ll always try and score points - that’s just the nature of the game - but this is about working for industry, and that’s what our focus is and that’s what the farmers’ focus is,” he said.

“We certainly need our departments and politicians doing the same.”

Last week, Mr Joyce said Dr Grimes was “a good man, a decent person and I am absolutely certain that he has a brilliant career in front of him just by his exemplary career in the public service”.

But he said he wanted to ensure his replacement has the capacity and the skill set that “is basically rooted in agriculture, grounded in agriculture and focused on agriculture”.

Mr Joyce also said the issues with Dr Grimes and Hansard accusations had consumed “an inordinate amount of time” and become an annoying distraction.

“I am an accountant by nature,” he said.

“As an accountant we have 75 billable units of six minutes each in the day – that’s how we work.

“When spending an inordinate amount of time not on billable hours, not on the things that actually look after the mums and dads but on a sort of bureaucratic paper trail then you get a sense of frustration and a sense of anger.

“So let’s move on.

“There are so many things that if the Shadow Minister wants to have a debate – ask me questions about drought, ask me questions about the Biosecurity Act, ask me questions that are relevant to getting mums and dads better returns,” Mr Joyce said.

“This whole thing where we are just fascinated in this nefarious process or what they believe is a nefarious process, of course I find that annoying.”

Colin Bettles

Colin Bettles

is the national political writer for Fairfax Agricultural Media
Date: Newest first | Oldest first


angry australian
24/03/2015 8:29:50 AM

Is Brent Finlay trying to justify his own relevance in Canberra? Brent, if we closed DAFF down and got rid of all 4000 how would industry be worse off? Where are all the pro-farmer/forestry/fishing policies from DAFF? Where are the pro-business/profit policies? How are the impacts on our rural communities assessed by DAFF? DAFF has become a plaything of the pro-green, pro-research, pro-anything except the national benefit class who think they best "know" how to run this nation. Paper trails have made most of our primary industries unprofitable and that couldn't be achieved without NFF's help.
Chick Olsson
24/03/2015 9:06:25 AM

Brent Finlay is correct. There are many in Canberra who have never set foot on a farm, so how could they every work for us? We need Pro farming advocates at every level in DAFF. No more professional seat polishers. Keep cleaning them out Barnaby.
John Niven
24/03/2015 9:24:11 AM

Just a cursory glance would suggest Brent Finlay is backing Dr. Grimes. Perhaps Joel Fitzgibbon is not the only one with an eye on Barnaby's job. Seriously if Barnaby is not just rabbiting on about paper trails associated with red tape wasting time and costing money he would abandon the NLIS nonsense based on fantasy costing $100 million p.a.
angry australian
24/03/2015 10:01:49 AM

Chick, did you read the article? Apparently Brent doesn't favour staff cuts at DAFF. The whole Dept. needs drano through it to clear out the crap, appointing Phillip Glyde will surely just be shuffling deckchairs on the Titanic as he would have worked on so many of the policies that impact on profitability.Business acumen is badly needed in the Dept, we have a government talking about reducing red/green tape and a Dept. that is expert in creating it. All this redtape costs, both industry and the taxpayer. Can anyone really explain what 4000 people do in DAFF that aids industry?
1/04/2015 3:06:02 PM

To answer your question, angry, .... they polish their CV, rewrite their KPIs and review every 6mths, um, ah, er, whinge about the air conditioning, write another meaningless report, re-write another meaningless report, have a meeting about a meeting......gosh is it smoko yet? then have another fire drill because the newspaper is late again! Then they need a full regime of command to manage morale and despondency. Yes Minister, DAFF is fully aided! The redundancy bill would be too high to wind it down.
1/04/2015 3:33:31 PM

What's worse than a politician? An agri-politician! Thanks NFF
5/08/2015 12:54:23 AM

We in the horticulture industry have for a long time suffered under the mendacity of DAFF (now DoA). Our plant imports are subjected to methyl bromide fumigation and we often loose large quantities. This is when there are better methods of post entry quarantine plant treatment. Oh but hey, it doesnt matter. We small business owners count for little. Meanwhile bureaucrats within the dept continue to kill our small businesses with excessive fees, fumigation and the shutting down of quarantine facilities. Oh but who cares, their jobs are safe enough.


Screen name *
Email address *
Remember me?
Comment *


light grey arrow
Sorry did i get it wrong..? Rankins Springs is still open..?!
light grey arrow
No doubt a few frosted Freddies out there who will wish they had taken a closer look at the AGC
light grey arrow
Matthew, I was wondering if you had followed up this story with the farmer after the whole